前言
非常感谢YxVM(Y哥)让我免费使用了两个月的HK Eco产品,作为持有HK elastic、Vol(HK/JP)的用户,一直以来都是使用直连机为主,目前使用elastic作为主力机,虽然流量只有256GB(双向),但是实际使用下来,我发现自己是一个优质用户(每个月其实差不多用个150GB左右,这还是经常看油管,当然也不是一天到晚都在看,打工人你懂的,正常使用)。后面加入NS论坛,不断学习相关VPS知识后,了解到了IEPL(专线),现在也买了NAT机器进行使用,以HK Eco作为落地机,下面就我的体验展开说说,希望后续还能够继续拿到免费的资格。
测试内容
因为Eco是作为我的落地机使用,这里我就不测试其CPU/内存/磁盘的性能了,我感觉可能更关注其网络连接性能比较合适。
配置如下:
CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8259CL CPU @ 2.50GHz 1 Virtual Core (0.83%)
硬盘: 2.45G / 19.52G (12.57%)
内存: 457.34M / 725.29M (63.06%)
流量: 2TB TRAFFIC单向
带宽: 1000Mbps PORT
经过官方一波升级,CPU和硬盘都升级了。(HK Elastic/Vol 都参与了升级,大大的好评!)
我主要从ip解锁,直连网络测试,IEPL中转,国际互联网络测试来进行,主打体验非专业测评。
上面硬件配置中我其实标注了当前我探针中的硬件占用情况,可以看出作为落地节点使用资源还是挺宽裕的,哪怕搭建个1ip,其实从硬盘中添加个swapfile应该也可以使用,毕竟硬盘是20G的高速SSD。
ip质量
从图中可以看到ipv4奈飞解锁在US,油管和声破天原生HK解锁(我看了油管是识别在HK,声破天没有测试),为了看流媒体的话,可以套个大善人DNS,不过我更愿意做一个二次分流。
网络连接
本地电信直连(竟然也能用)
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr Cwnd
[ 5] 25.00-26.00 sec 22.5 MBytes 189 Mbits/sec 1409 6.00 MBytes
[ 5] 26.00-27.00 sec 23.8 MBytes 199 Mbits/sec 50 2.64 MBytes
[ 5] 27.00-28.00 sec 15.0 MBytes 126 Mbits/sec 2002 838 KBytes
[ 5] 28.00-29.00 sec 12.5 MBytes 105 Mbits/sec 2188 1.91 MBytes
[ 5] 29.00-30.00 sec 17.5 MBytes 147 Mbits/sec 1604 2.57 MBytes
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr
[ 5] 0.00-30.10 sec 472 MBytes 132 Mbits/sec 56885 sender
aliyun-200M
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate
[ 5] 25.00-26.00 sec 25.2 MBytes 211 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 26.00-27.00 sec 25.4 MBytes 213 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 27.00-28.00 sec 16.9 MBytes 142 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 28.00-29.00 sec 24.1 MBytes 203 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 29.00-30.11 sec 25.0 MBytes 190 Mbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr
[ 5] 0.00-30.22 sec 679 MBytes 189 Mbits/sec 141 sender
[ 5] 0.00-30.11 sec 676 MBytes 188 Mbits/sec receiver
HK节点(对拉)
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate
[ 5] 25.00-26.00 sec 154 MBytes 1.30 Gbits/sec
[ 5] 26.00-27.00 sec 152 MBytes 1.28 Gbits/sec
[ 5] 27.00-28.00 sec 157 MBytes 1.32 Gbits/sec
[ 5] 28.00-29.00 sec 152 MBytes 1.28 Gbits/sec
[ 5] 29.00-30.00 sec 155 MBytes 1.30 Gbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr
[ 5] 0.00-30.02 sec 4.46 GBytes 1.28 Gbits/sec 102 sender
[ 5] 0.00-30.00 sec 4.46 GBytes 1.28 Gbits/sec receiver
SG节点(对拉)
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate
[ 5] 25.00-26.00 sec 91.6 MBytes 768 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 26.00-27.00 sec 92.1 MBytes 773 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 27.00-28.00 sec 91.7 MBytes 769 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 28.00-29.00 sec 89.1 MBytes 747 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 29.00-30.00 sec 92.2 MBytes 773 Mbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr
[ 5] 0.00-30.04 sec 2.64 GBytes 755 Mbits/sec 19 sender
[ 5] 0.00-30.00 sec 2.64 GBytes 755 Mbits/sec receiver
JP节点(对拉)
某家会限速的(可能不是eco的问题)
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate
[ 5] 25.00-26.00 sec 51.7 MBytes 434 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 26.00-27.00 sec 52.0 MBytes 436 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 27.00-28.00 sec 51.8 MBytes 435 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 28.00-29.00 sec 51.9 MBytes 435 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 28.00-29.00 sec 51.9 MBytes 435 Mbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate
[ 5] 0.00-29.00 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec sender
[ 5] 0.00-29.00 sec 1.42 GBytes 421 Mbits/sec receiver
KR节点(对拉)
自身节点出口200M限制
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate
[ 5] 25.00-26.00 sec 23.7 MBytes 199 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 26.00-27.00 sec 22.7 MBytes 191 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 27.00-28.00 sec 23.5 MBytes 197 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 28.00-29.00 sec 23.8 MBytes 200 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 29.00-30.00 sec 23.8 MBytes 200 Mbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr
[ 5] 0.00-30.04 sec 615 MBytes 172 Mbits/sec 3247 sender
[ 5] 0.00-30.00 sec 612 MBytes 171 Mbits/sec receiver
US节点(对拉)
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate
[ 5] 25.00-26.00 sec 19.8 MBytes 166 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 26.00-27.00 sec 19.7 MBytes 165 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 27.00-28.00 sec 19.7 MBytes 166 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 28.00-29.00 sec 19.0 MBytes 159 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 29.00-30.00 sec 18.8 MBytes 157 Mbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr
[ 5] 0.00-30.16 sec 539 MBytes 150 Mbits/sec 0 sender
[ 5] 0.00-30.00 sec 535 MBytes 150 Mbits/sec receiver
EU对拉
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate
[ 5] 25.00-26.00 sec 12.2 MBytes 102 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 26.00-27.00 sec 12.2 MBytes 102 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 27.00-28.00 sec 12.2 MBytes 102 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 28.00-29.00 sec 12.2 MBytes 102 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 29.00-30.00 sec 12.2 MBytes 102 Mbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr
[ 5] 0.00-30.19 sec 346 MBytes 96.2 Mbits/sec 0 sender
[ 5] 0.00-30.00 sec 344 MBytes 96.1 Mbits/sec receiver
IEPL(主动拉)
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate
[ 5] 25.00-26.00 sec 86.7 MBytes 726 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 26.00-27.00 sec 83.8 MBytes 704 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 27.00-28.00 sec 81.1 MBytes 681 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 28.00-29.00 sec 75.5 MBytes 633 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 29.00-30.00 sec 85.9 MBytes 720 Mbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr
[ 5] 0.00-30.01 sec 2.32 GBytes 665 Mbits/sec 154 sender
[ 5] 0.00-30.00 sec 2.32 GBytes 665 Mbits/sec receiver
总体对比如下:
节点 | 最高(Mbits/sec) | 平均(Mbits/sec) |
---|---|---|
本地电信 | 199 | 132 |
aliyun-200M | 213 | 188 |
HK | 1360 | 1280 |
SG | 774 | 755 |
JP | 437 | 421 |
KR | 200 | 171 |
US | 166 | 150 |
EU | 103 | 96 |
IEPL(深港) | 727 | 665 |
本地电信和阿里云前置能够有这种速度是我万万没想到的,本地电信ping过去延迟100ms左右,感觉基本可以直连使用,查看我的tz发现丢包率很低,延迟也是偶尔有个波峰,大部分时间可用性还是很强的。
本地电信Ping 统计信息:
数据包: 已发送 = 2139,已接收 = 2139,丢失 = 0 (0% 丢失),
往返行程的估计时间(以毫秒为单位):
最短 = 98ms,最长 = 114ms,平均 = 100ms
HK,SG,JP,KR基本能跑到我节点的上限,其实除开节点限制应该能够取得更好的速度,欧美的话单线100~150左右,没亚洲这么极致,但是基本也够用了。
Bench.sh
-------------------- A Bench.sh Script By Teddysun -------------------
Version : v2024-11-11
Usage : wget -qO- bench.sh | bash
----------------------------------------------------------------------
CPU Model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8259CL CPU @ 2.50GHz
CPU Cores : 1 @ 2494.138 MHz
CPU Cache : 16384 KB
AES-NI : ✓ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✓ Enabled
Total Disk : 19.6 GB (2.5 GB Used)
Total Mem : 725.3 MB (431.8 MB Used)
System uptime : 44 days, 17 hour 49 min
Load average : 0.10, 0.06, 0.02
OS : Debian GNU/Linux 12
Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel : 6.1.0-18-cloud-amd64
TCP CC : bbr
Virtualization : KVM
IPv4/IPv6 : ✓ Online / ✓ Online
Organization : AS49304 SAKURA LINK LIMITED
Location : Hong Kong / HK
Region : Hong Kong
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I/O Speed(1st run) : 246 MB/s
I/O Speed(2nd run) : 296 MB/s
I/O Speed(3rd run) : 392 MB/s
I/O Speed(average) : 311.3 MB/s
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Node Name Upload Speed Download Speed Latency
Speedtest.net 9097.98 Mbps 7275.93 Mbps 0.39 ms
Paris, FR 483.19 Mbps 3995.99 Mbps 168.61 ms
Amsterdam, NL 382.62 Mbps 3236.09 Mbps 217.48 ms
Shanghai, CN 532.53 Mbps 6005.77 Mbps 77.80 ms
Hong Kong, CN 8947.62 Mbps 6415.72 Mbps 2.97 ms
Singapore, SG 2240.99 Mbps 7189.06 Mbps 41.00 ms
Tokyo, JP 1713.87 Mbps 4077.88 Mbps 50.53 ms
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Finished in : 3 min 23 sec
Timestamp : 2025-03-06 02:43:43 UTC
----------------------------------------------------------------------
再补充一个bench.sh的图,果然是我的节点限制了这个发挥…小测一下80G流量没有了,以后还是别跑了,难以想象要是用Elastic跑这个脚本会多心疼。
目前我也没有什么极致的国际互联需求,仅仅从上面的网络对拉进行测试。
AS关系图
如图所示:46.232.60.0/24
归属于AS49304(SAKURA) 。该 IP 地址的 BGP 路由路径通过 AS9886(CTCSCI) 进行传输,最终流量进入全球 Tier 1 运营商 AS2914(NTT),以便更广泛地传播到互联网。
总结
非常优秀的国际互联,速度杠杠的。对于我日常使用来说,应该无法达到它的极致,再次感谢YxVM。如果要看流媒体的话,可以前置->ECO->落地解锁
,日常使用其实直接当落地就行,ip的纯净度也挺高的,特殊的地区做好分流即可。特别是看油管,起速非常快,一下子就可以跳到20~30W的速度,用下来非常丝滑,给超级棒的ECO点赞。